Global Palliative Care News Archive


Please feel free to share this weekly report with your colleagues.
Barry R. Ashpole, Guelph, Ontario, CANADA
519.837.8936 |

MW 509: Seeking certainty? Judicial approaches to the (non-) treatment of minimally conscious patients

Download the complete issue (PDF 475 KB)

Secondly, the judges appraise the types and forms of expertise that enter the courtroom, seeming to prefer the “objective” and “scientific,” and particularly the views of the doctors. Thirdly, the judges appear alert to the reasonableness of the evidence (and, indeed, the parties) and will look favourably on parties who are willing to co-operate. But the judges will not simply endorse any consensus reached by the parties; rather, the judges will reach their own decisions. Those decisions must be taken in the best interests of the patient. Fourthly, the judges approach this assessment in different ways. A balancing exercise is not consistently undertaken and, even in those cases in which it is, the weight accorded to particular factors varies. As the authors discuss, the consistency and predictability of the law in this area is open to question. Finally, however, they cautiously suggest that some consistent messages do begin to emerge: the courts’ apparent preference for certainty in diagnosis and prognosis provide pointers for how cases might be decided. view source »

MW 508: Palliative care in humanitarian crises: Always something to offer

Download the complete issue (PDF 450 KB)

PC is especially applicable in four humanitarian scenarios. First, in protracted humanitarian crises for patients with life-limiting illnesses whose pre crisis PC is interrupted and for those whose PC needs are unmet or exacerbated as a result of the crises. Older people are the most prominent group here, given their vulnerability and poorly identified and understood health-care needs. Second, in mass casualty events where resources are overwhelmed by acute injuries and individuals are triaged according to their likelihood of survival. Third, in communicable disease outbreaks with high mortality and limited therapeutic interventions where relief of suffering can be the main treatment option available... Fourth, in camps for refugees and displaced people where some individuals need PC during transition through the camp. view source »

MW 507: Final conversations: Overview and practical implications for patients, families, and healthcare workers

Download the complete issue (PDF 455 KB)

Final conversations take the family member’s perspective and highlights what are their memorable messages with the terminally ill loved one. The authors highlight the message themes present at the EoL for both adults and children, the functions each message theme serves for family members, and lastly, the communicative challenges of final conversations. Additionally, the authors discuss the current nature and future of final conversations research, with special attention paid to practical implications for healthcare providers, patients, and family members; also, scholarly challenges and future research endeavors are explored. view source »


MW 506: Palliative care in surgery: Defining the research priorities

Download the complete issue (PDF 550 KB)

To date, evidence to support the role of PC in surgical practice is sparse and PC research in surgery is encumbered by methodological challenges and entrenched cultural norms that impede appropriate provision of PC. The objective of this article is to describe the existing science of PC in surgery within three priority areas and expose specific gaps within the field. The authors propose a research agenda to address these gaps and provide a road map for future investigation. view source »

MW 505: Speaking a different language: A qualitative analysis comparing language of palliative care and pediatric intensive care unit physicians

Download the complete issue (PDF 550 KB)

The most common themes were giving medical information and discussing medical options. Themes unique to ICU physicians included statements of hopelessness, insensitivity, and “health-care provider challenges.” Among the 9 transcripts with the PC team, there were 280 statements, generating 10 thematic categories. Most commonly, the PC team offered statements of support, giving medical information, and quality of life. Both teams promoted family engagement by soliciting questions; however, the PC team was more likely to use open-ended questions, offer support, and discuss quality of life. view source »

MW 504: Law, ethics and end-of-life care: The policy and practice interface in England

Download the complete issue (PDF 600 KB)

Policy and practice must conform to the law, which defines liability in the EoL phase. However ... the law has primarily focused on the criminalisation of euthanasia and less on the complex issues involved in the "good death" concept. As a result, contemporary policy that helps to shape and direct EoL care faces a tension between EoL liability and the way in which PC is developing.2 The authors of this paper are not suggesting as a response to this tension that euthanasia should be legalised nor equating it with a "good death." The central argument from the authors of this paper is different: that for EoL care to develop and progress, practice has to interface with law and policy to a greater extent. A better interface will facilitate policy and law to be shaped by the complexity and demands of practice decision-making, so allowing a better understanding of what the EoL process entails. This is not to suggest that all EoL issues should be driven singularly by PC practice, but that a better future for the EoL entails the linking of law, policy and practice. view source »

1. 'Nursing and euthanasia: A review of argument-based ethics literature,' Nursing Ethics, 2009;16(4): 466-486. view source »

2. 'One Chance to Get it Right: Improving People's Experience of Care in the Last Few Days and Hours of Life,' Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People, June 2014. [Noted in Media Watch 30 June 2014, #364 (p.7)] view source »

MW 503: Perspectives of older people living in long-term care facilities and of their family members toward advance care planning discussions: A systematic review and thematic synthesis

Download the complete issue (PDF 600 KB)

This finding is consistent with previous studies and highlights the urgent need to enhance health care professionals' knowledge, skills and comfort in ACP conversations. Health care professionals who know an elder well were considered the ideal group of people to initiate ACP, and most elders and their families expected health care providers to initiate and anticipate their needs concerning EoL issues. The findings indicate that elders and their families desired a personalized approach by health care professionals within a relationship based on trust, respect and sensitivity. Regarding the "right time" to perform ACP, further studies are needed in order to develop appropriate guidance on approaching both residents and their family members. This review shows that, at least for the current generation of older people living in LTC settings, planning for non-medical issues is very important, suggesting the need to rethink ACP for this population and also to incorporate non-medical preferences. view source »

MW 502: Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision

Download the complete issue (PDF 425 KB)

DNACPR decisions were introduced to protect patients from invasive treatments that had little or no chance of success. However, inconsistencies in decision making, communication, and documentation have led to misunderstandings about what DNACPR means and to delivery of poorer care to some patients. The authors discuss the problems with current practice and outline newer approaches that place the patient, and their family, at the centre of the discussions. They focus on overall treatment plans and supporting clinicians and patients to make shared decisions about emergency treatments. Given the weight of evidence against DNACPR decisions being made in isolation, how much (and what kind of) evidence is needed before a new approach is adopted? Some of the principles underpinning the new approaches to resuscitation decisions are already widely accepted – clinicians need to understand what is important to each individual patient and to advise their patients which outcomes are clinically possible or likely. Others are drawn from the research literature –conversations should be undertaken proactively before a crisis occurs; the option of attempting CPR should be discussed with more people, not just those needing DNACPR decisions or approaching the end of life; resuscitation decisions should be contextualised within overall goals of care. The aim of ensuring that recommendations are documented in such a way that patients receive the right treatments at the right time is one which is universally accepted. view source »

MW 501: Understanding the impact of a new public health approach to end-of-life care: A qualitative study of a community led intervention

Download the complete issue (PDF 450 KB)

Three central impacts emerged. Participants stated that peer-support filled a gap in social support that neither professionals nor family could meet. Participants described becoming socially connected and linked this connection to increased wellbeing. Volunteers viewed themselves and those they visited as peers, despite differences in age or diagnosis. This view explained how compassion could be expressed, instead of a more detached form of empathy. A key facilitative process was the development of a relationship based on mutuality rather than passivity and dependence. On this basis, the relationship could be reconstructed outside the professional domain and could develop a depth and sustainability beyond the formal intervention. This study highlights the role of social networks in promoting wellbeing at the EoL. For sustainable changes to occur, relationships must be reciprocal rather than passive. These findings have important implications for how social care interventions are structured at the EoL. Peer support networks are a sustainable and appropriate care model, and this study provides evidence of their utility and sheds light on the fundamental components of compassionate care. view source »

MW 500: Patient reluctance to discuss pain: Understanding stoicism, stigma, and other contributing factors

Download the complete issue (PDF 750 KB)

The authors used a review of the available evidence to better understand the various factors that contribute to an unwillingness to disclose one's pain, create a conceptual model, and identify relevant assessment measures that may be useful to practitioners. Their review identified six primary attitudes and beliefs that contribute to patient reluctance to openly admit pain: 1) Stigma; 2) Stoicism; 3) Cautiousness; 4) Fatalism; 5) Bother; and, 6) Denial. Four assessment measures that address elements of barriers to pain-related communication and four measures of non-verbal signs of pain were also identified and reviewed. Based on the model, social workers and other palliative care providers should consistently and vigilantly inquire about how comfortable patients are about discussing their own pain. view source »


PATIENT EDUCATION & COUNSELING | Online – 16 February 2017 – 'Promoting patient participation in healthcare interactions through communication skills training: A systematic review.' Most [studies reviewed] targeted primary care or cancer patients and used a randomized controlled study design. Interventions used a variety of training formats and modes of delivering educational material. Reported findings suggest that communication training is an effective approach to increase patients' total level of active participation in healthcare interactions and that some communication behaviors may be more amenable to training (e.g., expressing concerns). view source »

MW 499: Death following recent admission into nursing home from community living: A systematic review into the transition process

Download the complete issue (PDF 500 KB)

Transition of care to the nursing home environment from the community is hazardous. A safer transfer is a duty care nursing home executives, managers, the government, and health and aged care professionals owe to residents. Answers are needed to the questions of whether, and to what extent, excess mortality is linked to the transfer process itself, to the environment and practices at destination, or to the fact that it is a significant stressful life event. This knowledge will contribute to providing optimal care for older people. Initiatives to make transitions safer are now possible by acting on the knowledge that there are modifiable risk factors. view source »

Discharging patients home from hospital at the end of life
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE | Online – 6 February 2017 – This article provides an overview of important considerations for the non-palliative care specialist when discharging a dying person home to his or her preferred place of care. A highly practical framework is included for identifying and assessing the patient's needs, and devising a tailored care plan. Rapid discharges at the end of life are complex processes which require the input of multiple health care professionals at every stage. With appropriate assessment and a framework to work from, such discharges can be successful. Key components for a rapid discharge are explored: 1) Recognition that the person has a deteriorating condition and may be dying, and communication with the person and/or carers such that they are aware of the situation; 2) Finding out what the person wants, including options around preferred place of care and death; 3) Assessment of clinical and care needs; 4) Provision of an individually-tailored care plan and package of care to support the person's needs; 5) Effective liaison with and communication of the person's needs and wishes to appropriate community services; and, 6) Exceptional circumstances or unusual situations (emergency department, outpatients, abroad, addiction, homelessness). view source »

MW 498: Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer: Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists

Download the complete issue (PDF 650 KB)

Patients often do not disclose their concerns and vary in the amount of information they want about the disease, prognosis, and treatment options, whereas physicians often do not know or enact patient preferences about end-of-life issues. Interventions to promote communication in cancer settings have targeted patients and physicians. Randomized controlled trials in early cancer and palliative care have shown that question prompt lists (QPLs) – structured lists of questions given to patients before consultations – help patients with cancer and their caregivers ask more questions, particularly if the physician also encourages and endorses the QPL. In addition, a tailored pre-visit educational coaching intervention (that did not involve QPLs) helped patients with cancer communicate concerns about pain. Meanwhile, an oncologist intervention that used audio recordings with tailored feedback positively influenced patient trust and oncologist responsiveness to patient emotions. Yet, no randomized trials have evaluated interventions directed toward both oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer who are not yet receiving palliative or hospice care. view source »

Learning to drive – early exposure to end-of-life conversations in medical training

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017; 376(5):413-415. Sent to visit a chronically ill patient at home, a medical student finds that his inexperience can be a strength. Instead of worrying about the right words and how to say them, he learns how to listen – exactly what the patient needs as she faces end-of-life decisions. view source »

MW 497: Clinical trials in palliative care: A systematic review of their methodological characteristics and of the quality of their reporting

Download the complete issue (PDF 650 KB)

To the authors' knowledge, this is the most comprehensive attempt to review clinical trials in palliative care literature. According to their results, it seems that the first step in generating not just valid, but also generalisable knowledge, is to clearly define PC populations, types of intervention and time to referral, establishing a common lexicon for clinicians and researchers. This will allow consensus to be achieved on the best outcomes and clinically meaningful differences, and will facilitate the choice of study design as well as promoting strategies to bypass the major barriers in PC research. The use of tools to help reporting study outcomes, such as CONSORT or SPIRIT, could also be a simple and efficient way of improving the quality of studies. view source »


§ THE GERONTOLOGIST | Online – 25 January 2017 – 'Practice concepts will become intervention research effective.' One of the greatest challenges in improving health care quality is the slow speed with which scientific innovation reaches practice. Only 14% of scientific discoveries reach practice at all, and when a practice is adopted, the process takes an average of 17 years...view source »

MW 496: Evolving ethical and legal implications for feeding at the end of life

Download the complete issue (PDF 500 KB)

MB is living with and dying from the end stages of Alzheimer's disease and in 2013 Margot, her family and the care facility she resides in were at the centre of a legal battle over the circumstances necessary to constitute an imposed duty on caregivers to provide the basic necessity of life (food). This case exposed a number of concerns: the questionable utility and limits of living wills, surrogacy decision making, the actual meaning of implied consent, and what exactly constitutes medical treatment versus basic care. What is unique about this case is that it does show gaps in both ethical and judicial analysis which has resulted in a legal decision to provide a level of care the family believes would be untenable and lacking in dignity for MB. view source »

MW 495: After the DNR: Surrogates who persist in requesting cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Download the complete issue (PDF 350 KB)

Although there is state-to-state variability[in the U.S.] and a considerable judicial gray area about the conditions and mechanisms for refusals to perform CPR, medical teams typically follow a set of clearly defined procedures for these decisions. The procedures are based on the principle of nonmaleficence and typically include consultation with hospital ethics committees, reflecting the guidelines of relevant professional associations. Ethical debates about when CPR can and should be limited tend to rely more on discussions of theory, principles, and case studies than systematic empirical study of the situations in which such limitations are applied. Sociologists of bioethics call for empirical study, arguing that what ethicists and health professionals believe they are doing when they draft policies or invoke principles does not always mirror what is happening on the ground. In this article, the authors begin the task of modeling the empirical analyses sociologists call for, focusing on a cohort at Massachusetts General Hospital. They inductively analyzed ethics committee notes and medical records of nineteen patients whose surrogates did not accept the decision to withhold CPR. view source »

MW 494: Collusions between patients and clinicians in end-of-life care: Why clarity matters

Download the complete issue (PDF 325 KB)

After an introductory definition of collusion, two archetypal situations of collusion – based on material from a regular supervision of a palliative care (PC) specialist by a liaison psychiatrist – and means of working through collusion are presented. The theoretical framework of collusion is then described and the conceptual shortcomings of the PC literature in this respect discussed, justifying the call for more clarity. Finally, cultural aspects and societal injunctions on the dying, contributing to the development of collusion in end-of-life care, are discussed. view source »

Help us to expand the resources on this site quickly.
Please send your suggestions to
Technical Issues? Contact

Page Last Modified: Mon Nov 17 2014