Global Palliative Care News Archive

MEDIA WATCH, CREATED AND DISTRIBUTED BY BARRY R. ASHPOLE

Please feel free to share this weekly report with your colleagues.
Barry R. Ashpole, Guelph, Ontario, CANADA
519.837.8936 | barryashpole@bell.net

MW 598: "This condition isn't going to get any better so I can't see why we're prolonging it": Risks and benefits of using empirical research to inform normative decisions concerning end-of-life care

Download the complete issue (PDF 625 KB)

However, moral questions, such as the right balance between preserving life and maximising quality of life, are an inherent part of the care-planning process. The authors take nutritional support as an example of one area of decision-making that needs to be addressed during care planning for people with progressive neurological disease. It describes research into the way in which the values of practitioners, members of the public and people with lived experience of progressive neurological disease may influence their decision-making about the right approach to maintaining nutritional intake during end-of-life care; and, discusses some of the challenges of incorporating such findings into normative frameworks. Abstract: view source »

Top ten tips palliative care clinicians should know about medical cannabis

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE | Online – 14 January 2019 – The use of medical cannabis is increasing significantly throughout the U.S. in spite of limited and sometimes contradictory data about its effectiveness. Palliative care providers are being asked to consider cannabis as part of symptom-directed treatment regimens although many providers have limited experience recommending medical cannabis and were trained before it was commercially available. This article seeks to dispel myths about medical cannabis and provides a balanced view of the benefits and burdens of this therapeutic option, providing evidence where it exists and offering practicing clinicians guidance on conditions in which medical cannabis is likely to be helpful or burdensome. Abstract: view source »

Reducing the role of the courts in treatment withdrawal

MEDICAL LAW REVIEW | Online – 15 January 2019 – In A National Health Service Trust and others v Y and another, the Supreme Court [in the U.K.] concludes that a court declaration is not a mandatory requirement before clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) is withdrawn from a person with prolonged disorder of consciousness (PDOC). The decision recognises the practical challenges for the courts, hospitals, and medical staff of involving over-worked courts in perceived non-controversial clinical judgments. It also recognises that judicial involvement can cause unnecessary anguish for the family and may merely delay the inevitable. It is an understandable decision and in most cases it is likely to be unproblematic. However, the judgment does not adequately recognise the vital role played by a court application in ensuring that the voice of the incapacitated patient is heard and explicitly considered by a neutral person. The withdrawal of CANH from persons in PDOC raises unique ethical concerns because it leads to the death of a vulnerable person not able to express his or her own opinion on whether life should now cease and it does so by withdrawing the most basic of medical treatment. It brings to an end the state's positive steps to preserve the life of the patient and thus requires very careful scrutiny in order to ensure compatibility with Article 2. It is regrettable, therefore, that the Supreme Court in Y has removed a valuable safeguard for both the right to life and the autonomy of incapacitated patients. Full text: view source »

MW 597: New definition of palliative care

Download the complete issue (PDF 750 KB)

A 2002 definition by the World Health Organization (WHO) limits PC to a service that can be offered to relieve problems associated with life-threatening illnesses.1 Following the recommendation of The Lancet Commission on PC and pain relief,2 and as an organization in official relations with the WHO, the Association designed, developed, and implemented a project to revise and adopt a new PC definition. The objective was to find consensus on a definition that focuses on the relief of suffering, and is also timely and applicable to all patients regardless of diagnosis, prognosis, geographic location, point of care, or income level. Download/view at: view source »

1. 'Definition of Palliative Care,' WHO, 2002. Download/view at: view source »

2. 'Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief: An imperative of universal health coverage,' The Lancet, October 2017. [Noted in 16 October 2017 issue of Media Watch (#534, p.14)] Full text: view source »

Spiritual uncertainty among hospice providers – "there were tensions"

JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2019;21(1):90-95. How providers of end-of-life (EoL) care perceive spirituality both within themselves and for others can directly impact their ability to provide spiritual care to patients and families. Uncertainty about spirituality can contribute to the awkwardness of spiritual care. Spiritual uncertainty includes the questions, worries, and doubts people have about the meaning, beliefs, connections, self-transcendence, and value that comprise spirituality. This article reports qualitative findings from a mixed-methods study that sought to understand spiritual uncertainty among hospice providers. Data were collected from 28 hospice team members (nurses, physicians, social workers, and expressive therapist) using focus groups, reflective journals, and one-on-one interviews. An overarching theme emerged that described the tensions perceived by providers caring for hospice patients. Those tensions were further categorized as being interpersonal, intrapersonal, and transpersonal in nature. The identification of tension as a source of strain for providers delivering spiritual care is necessary to the development of future interventions that can assist providers and patients navigating EoL spirituality. Abstract: view source »

Understanding the barriers to introducing early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A qualitative study

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE | Online – 11 January 2019 – The findings of this study suggest that referral to palliative care (PC) specialists shortly after the diagnosis of advanced cancer increases the terminological barriers, induces avoidance patterns, and makes early disclosure of poor prognosis harder for oncologists. This situation is attributable to the widespread idea that PC means terminal care. In addition, the fact that the "early palliative care" (EPC) concept is poorly understood increases the confusion between EPC and supportive care. Defining the EPC concept more clearly and explaining to health professionals and patients what EPC consists of and what role it is intended to play, and the potential benefits of PC services could help to overcome the wording barriers rooted in the traditional picture of PC. Abstract: view source »

MW 596: Caring for dying patients: Visual narratives from the intensive care unit

Download the complete issue (PDF 550 KB)

Creating these visual images helped me to reflect and better understand how our daily medical interventions truly impact patient care. For viewers, I hope these images facilitate more mindful ways to care for patients and their families as they face illness and death. Each drawing represents a composite of patients I have encountered, and I used donated cadavers from the New York University Anatomy Lab to help accurately depict the anatomy in my illustrations. Full (illustrated) text: view source »

What does the word "treatable" mean? Implications for communication and decision-making in critical illness

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE | Online – 21 December 2018 – The authors identified two distinct concepts that study participants used to interpret the word "treatable": 1) A "good news" concept, in which the word "treatable" conveys a positive message about a patient's future, thereby inspiring hope and encouraging further treatment; and, 2) An "action-oriented" concept, in which the word "treatable" conveys that physicians have an action or intervention available, but does not necessarily imply an improved prognosis or quality of life. The overwhelming majority of non-physicians adopted the "good news" concept, whereas physicians almost exclusively adopted the "action-oriented" concept. For some non-physicians, the word "treatable" conveyed a positive message about prognosis and/or further treatment, even when this contradicted previously stated negative information. Physician use of the word "treatable" may lead patients or surrogates to derive unwarranted good news and false encouragement to pursue treatment, even when physicians have explicitly stated information to the contrary. Further work is needed to determine the extent to which the word "treatable" and its cognates contribute to widespread decision-making and communication challenges in critical care, including discordance about prognosis, misconceptions that palliative treatments are curative, and disputes about potentially inappropriate or futile treatment. Abstract: view source »

Publishing Matters

Predatory open-access publishing in palliative and supportive care

JOURNAL OF PAIN & SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | Online – 27 December 2018 – Predatory publishing is commonly defined as an exploitative, fraudulent, open-access model that applies charges to authors without providing proper editorial services, characteristic of legitimate journals. This phenomenon is universally considered as one of the most serious threats to scientific community. To enhance awareness among scholars and clinicians, predatory publishing has been surveyed in several biomedical fields, such as neuroscience, orthopedics, rehabilitation, and anesthesiology. Abstract (inc. link to references): view source »

Help us to expand the resources on this site quickly.
Please send your suggestions to
Technical Issues? Contact gdraeger@sweetthursdayweb.com

Page Last Modified: Mon Nov 17 2014